Hometop nav spacerAbout ARStop nav spacerHelptop nav spacerContact Ustop nav spacerEn Espanoltop nav spacer
Printable VersionPrintable Version     E-mail this pageE-mail this page
United States Department of Agriculture Agricultural Research Service
Search
 
 
 
National Programs
International Programs
Find Research Projects
The Research Enterprise
Office of Scientific Quality Review
Research Initiatives
 

Title: A STATISTICAL COMPARISON OF MARYBLYT(TRADEMARK) AND COUGARBLIGHT WITH SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS

Authors
item Dewdney, Megan - CORNELL UNIVERSITY
item Biggs, Alan - WEST VIRGINIA UNIV
item Turechek, William

Submitted to: Acta Horticulture Proceedings
Publication Type: Proceedings
Publication Acceptance Date: March 1, 2005
Publication Date: February 1, 2006
Citation: Dewdney, M., Bigg, A., Turechek, W. 2006. A statistical comparison of maryblyt(trademark) and cougarblight with sensitivity analysis. Acta Horticulture Proceedings. 704:171-176.

Technical Abstract: MARYBLYT trademark and Cougarblight are fire blight forecasters used to identify blossom infection periods for Erwinia amylovora on apple (Malus xdomestica) and pear (Pyrus communis). MARYBLYT uses flowering, an index of bacterial population (EIP), a measurement of wetting, and average daily temperature, whereas Cougarblight uses flowering, wetting, a 4-day temperature window, and orchard fire blight history as parameters for predicting blossom infection. Sensitivity analysis was used to evaluate both models for their ability to predict fire blight using historical weather and disease incidence data collected from several regions. The results showed that the two forecasters performed similarly in their ability to predict blossom blight. However, regional differences in predictive ability were evident, with best performance of both forecasters occurring in England. Further analysis is needed to determine the reasons for the regional differences.

   
 
 
Last Modified: 05/23/2013
ARS Home | USDA.gov | Site Map | Policies and Links 
FOIA | Accessibility Statement | Privacy Policy | Nondiscrimination Statement | Information Quality | USA.gov | White House